HOW TO RECOVER     QUICKLY WHEN  YOUR   HABITS BREAK DOWN



No matter   how consistent you are with your habits,   it  is     inevitable that life will interrupt you at some point.     Perfection is  not possible. Before long,    an emergency will     pop up—you get sick or you have to travel for work or     your family    needs a   little more of your time.

Whenever  this happens to me, I   try to remind  myself     of a   simple rule:    never miss twice.

If I   miss one day, I   try to get back into it  as quickly as possible.

Missing one workout happens, but I’m not going to miss two in     a   row. Maybe    I’ll eat an entire    pizza, but I’ll follow     it  up with a   healthy  meal. I can’t    be perfect, but I     can avoid a   second   lapse. As soon as one streak ends,    I     get started   on the next one.

The   first mistake is  never the one that ruins you. It  is     the spiral of repeated mistakes that follows.  Missing once is  an     accident. Missing twice is  the start of a   new habit.

This  is  a   distinguishing feature  between winners and     losers.    Anyone can    have a   bad performance, a   bad     workout, or a   bad day at work. But when successful people     fail, they rebound quickly. The breaking of a habit   doesn’t     matter   if  the reclaiming of it  is  fast.

I think this principle is  so important that I’ll stick to it     even if  I   can’t do a   habit as well or as completely as     I   would    like. Too often,     we fall into  an all-or-nothing     cycle with our habits.   The problem is  not slipping    up;     the problem is  thinking that if  you can’t do something perfectly, then you shouldn’t do it  at all.

You   don’t realize    how valuable it  is  to just show up on     your bad (or busy) days. Lost days hurt you more than successful     days help you. If you     start with $100,    then a   50 percent     gain will take you to $150. But you only need a   33 percent     loss to take you back to $100.    In other words,   avoiding     a   33 percent loss is  just as valuable as achieving a     50 percent gain. As Charlie  Munger says, “The first rule of     compounding: Never interrupt it  unnecessarily.”

This  is  why the “bad” workouts are often the most important     ones. Sluggish days and bad workouts maintain the compound     gains you accrued    from previous good days. Simply   doing     something—ten squats,    five sprints,  a   push-up, anything     really—is huge. Don’t put up a zero.   Don’t let losses     eat     into your compounding.

Furthermore, it’s not always   about     what happens during     the workout.  It’s about     being the type of person   who     doesn’t  miss workouts. It’s easy to train when you feel good,     but it’s crucial   to show up when you don’t feel like it—even     if  you do less than you hope. Going to the gym for five     minutes may not improve your performance, but it reaffirms     your identity.

The   all-or-nothing cycle of behavior change  is  just one     pitfall     that can derail your habits.   Another potential     danger—especially   if  you are using a   habit tracker—is     measuring the wrong    thing.

KNOWING WHEN  (AND     WHEN  NOT) TO TRACK A  HABIT

Say you’re    running a   restaurant and you want to know if     your chef is doing a   good job. One way to measure success     is  to track how many customers pay for a   meal each day. If     more customers come in, the food must be good. If  fewer     customers come in, something must be wrong.

However,   this one measurement—daily revenue—only gives a limited     picture  of what’s    really going on. Just because someone     pays for a   meal doesn’t  mean they enjoy the meal. Even     dissatisfied customers are unlikely to dine and dash. In fact, if     you’re    only measuring revenue, the food might    be getting     worse    but you’re    making up for it  with marketing or     discounts or some other method. Instead, it may    be more     effective to track how many customers finish     their meal or     perhaps the percentage of customers who leave a   generous     tip.

The   dark side of tracking a   particular behavior is  that we     become driven by the number rather    than the purpose     behind   it. If  your success   is  measured by quarterly     earnings, you will optimize sales, revenue, and accounting for     quarterly earnings. If  your success  is measured    by a     lower number on the scale, you will optimize for a   lower number on the scale, even if  that means   embracing crash diets,     juice cleanses, and fat-loss  pills. The human  mind wants    to     “win” whatever game is  being played.

This  pitfall     is  evident  in many areas of life. We focus on     working long  hours     instead  of getting  meaningful work     done. We care more about    getting  ten thousand steps than we     do about     being healthy. We teach for standardized   tests     instead  of emphasizing   learning, curiosity, and critical     thinking. In short,    we optimize for what we measure.     When we choose   the wrong    measurement, we get the     wrong    behavior.

This  is  sometimes referred to as Goodhart’s Law. Named     after the economist Charles  Goodhart, the principle states,     “When   a   measure becomes    a   target,   it  ceases    to     be a   good measure.” Measurement is  only useful when it     guides    you and adds context  to a   larger    picture,     not when it  consumes you. Each number is  simply   one     piece of feedback in the     overall   system.

In our data-driven world,    we tend to overvalue numbers and undervalue anything ephemeral, soft, and difficult to quantify. We mistakenly think the factors   we can measure are the only factors     that exist. But just because you can measure something doesn’t     mean it’s the   most important thing.    And just because you     can’t measure something doesn’t  mean it’s not important at all.

All of this to say, it’s crucial   to keep habit tracking in its     proper place.  It  can feel satisfying to record   a   habit     and track your progress, but  the measurement is  not the     only thing that matters. Furthermore, there are many ways to     measure progress, and sometimes it  helps to shift  your focus to     something entirely  different.

This  is  why nonscale victories can be effective for weight     loss. The number   on the scale may be stubborn, so if     you focus solely on that number,  your motivation will sag. But     you may notice    that your skin looks better    or you wake up     earlier    or your sex drive got a   boost.    All of these     are valid ways to track your improvement. If  you’re    not     feeling motivated by the number on the scale, perhaps it’s     time to focus on a different measurement—one that gives you     more signals   of progress.

No     matter   how you measure your improvement, habit tracking offers a   simple   way to make your habits    more satisfying. Each measurement provides a   little bit of evidence that you’re     moving  in the right direction and a   brief moment of     immediate pleasure for a   job well done.

 

Chapter Summary

 One of the most satisfying feelings  is  the feeling   of making progress.

 A    habit tracker  is  a   simple   way to measure whether you did a habit—like   marking an X  on a   calendar.

 Habit trackers and other visual forms    of measurement can make your habits    satisfying by providing clear evidence of your progress.

Don’t break the chain.    Try to keep your habit streak    alive.

Never miss twice.    If  you miss one day, try to get back on track as quickly as possible.

 Just because you can measure something doesn’t  mean it’s the most important thing.

17

How an Accountability Partner Can

Change Everything

A

FTER    SERVING  AS  a   pilot in World    War II, Roger Fisher    attended

Harvard Law School   and spent thirty-four years specializing in negotiation     and conflict  management. He founded the Harvard Negotiation    Project  and worked  with numerous countries and     world leaders  on peace resolutions,    hostage crises,    and     diplomatic compromises. But it  was in the 1970s    and     1980s,   as the threat    of nuclear war escalated, that Fisher     developed perhaps his most interesting idea.

At the time, Fisher    was focused  on designing strategies that     could prevent nuclear  war, and he had noticed  a     troubling fact. Any sitting president would    have access    to     launch   codes that could kill millions of people but would     never actually see anyone  die because he would always  be     thousands of miles away.

“My   suggestion was quite simple,” he wrote     in 1981. “Put     that [nuclear] code number in a   little capsule, and then     implant that capsule    right next to the heart of a     volunteer. The volunteer would carry    with him a   big, heavy     butcher knife as he accompanied  the President. If  ever     the President wanted  to fire nuclear  weapons, the only     way he could do so would    be for him first, with his     own hands,   to kill one human  being.    The President says,     ‘George, I’m sorry but tens of   millions must die.’ He has to     look at someone and realize    what death is—what an     innocent death is. Blood on the White    House   carpet.     It’s reality brought home.

“When I   suggested this to friends   in the Pentagon they said, ‘My

God, that’s terrible. Having  to kill someone would    distort     the

President’s judgment. He might    never push the button.’”

Throughout our discussion of the 4th Law of Behavior Change     we have covered the importance     of making  good habits     immediately satisfying. Fisher’s proposal is  an inversion of     the 4th Law: Make     it immediately unsatisfying.

Just  as we are more likely to repeat    an experience when     the ending is satisfying, we are also more likely to avoid an     experience when the ending is  painful.  Pain is  an effective     teacher. If  a   failure    is  painful,  it gets    fixed. If  a     failure    is  relatively painless, it  gets ignored. The more immediate and more costly     a   mistake is, the faster you will     learn from it.  The threat    of a   bad review   forces    a     plumber to be good at his job. The possibility of a     customer never returning makes    restaurants create good     food.     The cost of cutting  the wrong    blood vessel     makes    a     surgeon master human  anatomy and cut carefully. When     the consequences are severe, people   learn quickly.

The   more immediate the pain, the less likely the behavior. If     you want to prevent bad habits    and eliminate unhealthy     behaviors, then adding    an instant   cost to the action    is     a   great way to reduce   their odds.

We    repeat    bad habits    because they serve us in some     way, and that makes them hard to abandon. The best way I     know to overcome this predicament is  to increase the speed of     the punishment    associated with the behavior. There    can’t be     a   gap between the action    and the consequences.

As soon as actions  incur an immediate consequence,  behavior begins   to change. Customers pay their bills on time when they     are charged    a   late fee. Students show up to class when     their grade is  linked to attendance.     We’ll jump through a   lot     of hoops    to avoid a   little bit of immediate  pain.

There is, of course,  a   limit to this. If  you’re    going to     rely on punishment to change  behavior, then the strength of     the punishment must    match    the relative  strength of     the behavior it  is  trying    to correct. To be productive,     the cost of procrastination must be greater  than the cost of     action.   To be healthy, the cost of laziness  must be     greater  than the cost of exercise. Getting  fined for smoking     in a   restaurant or failing to recycle   adds consequence   to     an action.   Behavior only shifts if  the punishment is  painful     enough  and reliably  enforced.

In general, the more local, tangible, concrete, and immediate the consequence,  the more likely it  is  to influence individual     behavior. The more global,   intangible, vague,    and delayed     the consequence,  the less likely it  is  to influence     individual behavior.

Thankfully, there is  a   straightforward way to add an     immediate cost to   any bad habit:    create    a   habit     contract.

THE HABIT  CONTRACT

The first seat belt law was passed   in New York on December 1,     1984. At the    time, just 14 percent of people   in the     United   States    regularly wore a seat belt—but that was all     about     to change.

Within five years,     over half of the nation    had seat belt     laws. Today, wearing a   seat belt is  enforceable     by law in     forty-nine of the fifty states. And it’s not just the legislation,     the number of people   wearing seat belts has changed     dramatically   as well. In 2016, over 88 percent of Americans     buckled up each time they got in a   car. In just over     thirty years,    there was a   complete reversal in the habits     of millions of people.

Laws and regulations are an example of how government     can change our habits    by creating a   social contract. As a     society,  we collectively agree to abide by certain   rules and     then enforce  them as a group. Whenever a   new piece of     legislation impacts behavior—seat belt laws, banning smoking     inside     restaurants,    mandatory recycling—it   is an example of     a   social contract shaping our habits.   The group    agrees     to act in a   certain   way, and if  you don’t follow    along,     you’ll be punished.

Just  as governments  use laws to hold citizens  accountable,     you can create a   habit contract to hold yourself accountable.     A  habit contract is a verbal    or written  agreement in     which    you state your commitment  to a particular     habit     and the punishment    that will occur if  you don’t follow through. Then you find one or two people   to act as your     accountability partners    and sign off on the contract with     you.

Bryan Harris,  an entrepreneur  from Nashville, Tennessee, was     the first person   I   saw put this strategy into action.     Shortly  after the birth of his son, Harris   realized  he wanted     to shed a   few pounds. He wrote     up a habit   contract     between himself, his wife, and his personal trainer.  The first     version  read, “Bryan’s #1 objective for Q1 of 2017 is  to     start eating correctly again so he feels better,   looks better,     and is  able to hit his long-term goal of 200 pounds  at     10% body fat.”

Below that statement, Harris   laid out a   road map for     achieving his ideal outcome:

Phase #1: Get back to a   strict “slow-carb”    diet in Q1.

Phase #2: Start a   strict macronutrient tracking program in Q2.

Phase #3: Refine    and maintain the details    of his diet and workout program    in Q3.

Finally, he wrote     out each of the daily habits    that would     get him to his goal. For example, “Write   down all food that he     consumes each day and  weigh    himself  each day.”

And   then he listed the punishment    if  he failed:    “If     Bryan    doesn’t  do these two items then the following     consequence   will be enforced: He will  have to dress up     each workday and each Sunday  morning for the rest of     the quarter. Dress up is  defined  as not wearing jeans, t-shirts, hoodies, or shorts.   He will also give Joey (his trainer)     $200 to use as he sees fit if  he misses   one day of     logging  food.”

At the bottom  of the page, Harris,  his wife, and his trainer     all signed the contract.

My    initial reaction was that a   contract like this seemed     overly formal  and unnecessary,  especially the signatures. But     Harris convinced me that signing  the contract was an     indication of seriousness. “Anytime I   skip this part,”     he     said, “I  start slacking almost immediately.”

Three months later, after hitting   his targets   for Q1, Harris     upgraded his  goals. The consequences escalated, too. If  he     missed   his carbohydrate and protein  targets,  he had to     pay his trainer   $100.    And if    he failed to weigh     himself, he had to give his wife $500 to use as she saw     fit. Perhaps most painfully, if  he forgot    to run sprints,     he had to dress up for work every day and wear an     Alabama hat the rest of the quarter—the bitter rival of his     beloved  Auburn team.

The   strategy worked. With his wife and trainer   acting    as accountability partners and with the habit contract clarifying exactly what to do each day, Harris   lost the weight.*

To make bad habits    unsatisfying,   your best option   is  to     make them painful  in the moment. Creating a   habit contract     is  a   straightforward way to do exactly   that.

Even if  you don’t want to create    a   full-blown habit     contract, simply having an accountability partner  is  useful.     The comedian Margaret Cho writes a   joke or song every day.     She does the “song a   day” challenge with a   friend,   which     helps them both stay accountable.   Knowing that someone is     watching can be a   powerful motivator. You are less likely to procrastinate  or give up because there is  an immediate cost. If     you don’t follow    through, perhaps they’ll    see you as     untrustworthy or lazy. Suddenly, you are not only failing    to     uphold   your promises to yourself, but   also failing    to     uphold   your promises to others.

You   can even automate this process. Thomas Frank,   an entrepreneur  in Boulder, Colorado, wakes    up at 5:55 each     morning. And if  he doesn’t, he has a   tweet automatically     scheduled that says,

“It’s 6:10 and I’m not up because I’m lazy! Reply to this for $5     via

PayPal   (limit 5), assuming my alarm     didn’t malfunction.”

We    are always   trying    to present  our best selves     to     the world.    We comb our hair and brush    our teeth and     dress ourselves carefully because we know these habits    are likely to     get a   positive reaction. We want to get good grades     and graduate from top schools  to impress potential     employers and mates    and our friends   and family.   We     care about the opinions of those around  us because it     helps if  others    like us. This is  precisely why getting  an     accountability partner  or signing  a habit   contract can     work so well.

 

Chapter Summary

 The inversion of the 4th Law of Behavior Change  is make it unsatisfying.

 We are less likely to repeat    a   bad habit if  it  is painful   or unsatisfying.

 An  accountability partner  can create    an immediate cost to inaction. We care deeply    about     what others    think of us, and we do not    want others    to have a   lesser opinion  of us.

 A    habit contract can be used to add a   social cost to any behavior.

It   makes    the costs of violating your promises public and painful.

 Knowing  that someone else is  watching you can be a powerful motivator.


Дата добавления: 2019-09-02; просмотров: 264; Мы поможем в написании вашей работы!

Поделиться с друзьями:






Мы поможем в написании ваших работ!